top of page

Does Polyurea Cost Less Than Epoxy?

When it comes to coating surfaces, especially floors, two of the most popular options you'll hear about are polyurea and epoxy. But let's cut to the chase—what everyone really wants to know is, "Is polyurea cheaper than epoxy?" Well, let's dive into this topic and break it down in simple terms.

Does Polyurea Cost Less Than Epoxy?

Understanding the Basics

Before we get into the nitty-gritty of costs, it's essential to understand what we're dealing with here. Both polyurea and epoxy are types of coatings used for protecting and enhancing the durability of surfaces. These coatings are often used in garages, basements, and industrial settings because they offer excellent protection against wear and tear.

Epoxy is a type of resin that, when mixed with a hardener, forms a rigid plastic material. It’s known for its strong adhesion, durability, and resistance to chemicals. It’s been around for a while and is a go-to for many do-it-yourselfers and professionals alike.

Polyurea, on the other hand, is a newer technology. It’s a type of elastomer derived from step-growth polymerization, which involves combining a synthetic resin and an isocyanate-reactive material. The result is a coating that cures extremely fast and is highly flexible.

Cost Comparison

Now, let's get to the main question—cost. On the surface, you might think that polyurea would be more expensive given its advanced properties and the fact that it’s a newer technology. However, the answer isn’t as straightforward as it seems.

Material Costs:

  • Epoxy: The material cost of epoxy is generally lower than polyurea. You can find decent quality epoxy kits at various price points, but they typically range from $3 to $12 per square foot depending on the brand and the specific type of epoxy.

  • Polyurea: Polyurea tends to be more expensive, ranging from $5 to $15 per square foot. This is due to the advanced chemistry and the higher performance characteristics it offers.

Installation Costs:

  • Epoxy: Installing epoxy can be a bit more time-consuming and labor-intensive. The surface needs to be prepped meticulously, often requiring multiple coats with significant drying time in between. If you're hiring professionals, labor costs can add up quickly.

  • Polyurea: Polyurea is known for its rapid curing time—it can be ready to use in a matter of hours. This quick turnaround can reduce labor costs significantly. However, due to the specialized equipment and skills required for installation, the initial labor cost might be higher.

Longevity and Maintenance:

  • Epoxy: While epoxy is durable, it can yellow over time, especially when exposed to UV light. It may also chip or crack under heavy impact or extreme temperature changes. Maintenance and potential reapplications can add to the overall cost over the years.

  • Polyurea: Polyurea is extremely durable and resistant to UV light, chemicals, and abrasions. It’s less likely to chip or crack and can handle extreme temperatures. This durability often means lower maintenance costs over time.

Breaking It Down

When you’re looking at the price tag of installing a new floor coating, you need to consider more than just the initial cost. Let’s say you’re coating a typical two-car garage, which is about 400 square feet.

  • Epoxy Cost Breakdown:

  • Material: $3 to $12 per square foot = $1,200 to $4,800

  • Labor (if hiring professionals): $1,000 to $3,000

  • Polyurea Cost Breakdown:

  • Material: $5 to $15 per square foot = $2,000 to $6,000

  • Labor: $1,500 to $3,500

  • Total: $3,500 to $9,500


Cost per Square Foot (USD)



$3 - $7

3 - 5 years


$7 - $12

15+ years

At first glance, epoxy seems cheaper, especially if you’re leaning towards DIY. However, there are a few other factors to consider.

DIY vs. Professional Installation

One of the reasons epoxy is so popular is because it’s more accessible for DIY projects. You can pick up a kit from your local hardware store, follow the instructions, and have a decent floor coating over a weekend. Polyurea, however, is a different beast. Its fast curing time means you need to work quickly and efficiently, often requiring specialized equipment and experience.

If you’re a DIY enthusiast looking to save money, epoxy might be the way to go. But if you’re thinking long-term and considering the overall value, polyurea could be worth the higher upfront cost due to its durability and low maintenance.

Performance and Longevity

When evaluating the cost, you also have to think about performance and how long the coating will last.

  • Epoxy: Generally lasts 3-5 years in residential settings with moderate use. High-traffic areas or industrial settings might see shorter lifespans.

  • Polyurea: Can last 15 years or more, even in high-traffic areas. It’s designed to withstand the harshest conditions without significant wear and tear.

If you plan to stay in your home for a long time or use the space heavily, the longevity of polyurea might make it more cost-effective in the long run.

Aesthetic and Customization

Both of these substances provide a variety of customization options. You have the freedom to pick different hues, incorporate flakes or metallic effects, and attain a spectrum of finishes. However, polyurea’s flexibility means it can offer more advanced finishes and better resistance to wear over time.

Environmental and Health Considerations

Another aspect to ponder is the impact on the environment and health. Both of these substances can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during applicatio. However, newer formulations of polyurea are designed to be more environmentally friendly and have lower VOC emissions compared to traditional epoxies.

Conclusion: Which is Cheaper?

So, is one cheaper than the other? In terms of initial costs, the answer is no. But when you take into account factors like installation costs, durability, maintenance, and performance, one might offer a better bang for your buck in the long haul.

If you’re working with a tight budget and are up for a DIY project, the latter could be your best bet. It’s a proven method that can yield excellent results when done right. However, if you’re in the market for a solution that offers high performance and longevity, and you’re okay with shelling out a bit more upfront, the former could be a wiser pick.

In the end, the choice boils down to your specific requirements, budget, and how you intend to utilize the space. Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of both can aid you in making a decision that best fits your circumstances. So, the next time someone inquires, “Is one cheaper than the other?” you can assertively respond, “Not necessarily, but it could be worth every dime.”


bottom of page